steps in policy change, while among others the analysis may have
barely begun.
This is
therefore a pivotal period in African university development. It
happens to coincide with a seismic shift in the balance of
political forces in sub-Saharan Africa. It remains to be seen
whether or not the democratization debate results in radical and
permanent changes in the political topography of individual states,
or merely causes tremors and opens fissures. What is beyond doubt
is that the universities of Africa, to a greater or lesser extent,
had been actors in this debate well before it had formally been
declared open by many state authorities, and they are certain to
become more involved, in a variety of ways, as the debate proceeds.
Not for the first time, some African academics are already paying a
heavy price for their democratic convictions.
Not only are
the universities, as major national institutions and citadels of
opinion, bound to participate in the political debate, but it would
be surprising if the policy discussions on university reform or
restructuring were to be kept separate from the wider political
issues. Among the questions already being raised on African
campuses is the implications of political democratization for the
governance of universities, both externally and internally. Another
question, which is even more speculative, is how the management of
public demand for higher education might be undertaken under more
liberal and competitive political systems.
The crisis in
African higher education mirrors the deep crises in national
economies and national political systems. Not surprisingly, many
African academic people are impatient with a merely technical
response to the university crisis and argue the need for a
re-examination of the developmental mission of African universities
in the 1990s.
Most of this
report discusses issues which are directly related to the mission
of African universities, but there is no systematic treatment of
the debate and no attempt to construct a new model of African
university development. A single model is in any case
inappropriate. In fact, phrases like `the African university' are
wide of the mark. Diversity reigns in the African university
community, as in African political economies, and what is needed
are complex rather than unitary models of African university
systems and their roles in the rehabilitation, reconstruction and
development of their communities, countries and region.
Donor
policies and African dialog
Donors to
African higher education, especially those which wish to help
governments and universities address the structural problems of
university systems, are operating on important and sensitive
terrain. They are clearly under scrutiny and they have an
obligation to declare their own motives and interests explicitly so
that the common ground may be found and acted upon. In