View all Archives -
Development Finance and Economic Security »
The Common Good: Social Welfare and the American Future
such cost-control measures will avoid the painful choices
between raising taxes and increasing the financial contributions
that the elderly make to Medicare. The situation is made more
difficult by the fact that Medicare is headed for trouble even
though it hardly addresses one of the most important and rapidly
growing needs— long-term care for chronic illness.
Consequently, it seems likely that Medicare is going to require
both new cost-control measures and new money so the program can
assure actuarial soundness in the Hospital Insurance trust fund and
extend a greater measure of government protection for long-term
care.
Although
cost-containment policies are in place for hospitals, Medicare
needs a new system of paying individual physicians in order to help
bring their cost increases under control. The current system
underwrites cost escalation and fails to create incentives for
physicians to economize on the use of health services. Other
measures might include a greater emphasis on alternative
health-care delivery systems and greater government efforts to
steer Medicare patients toward "preferred providers" who charge
reasonable fees and have demonstrated their cost-effectiveness.
These reforms are easier to outline than to implement. One should
not under-estimate the difficulty of decelerating Medicare cost
increases without jeopardizing the quality of health care or access
to it.
Creating
Protection for Long-Term Care
Even though
our society spends about $100 billion per year on Medicare and
about $50 billion on Medicaid, the elderly remain vulnerable to the
costs of lingering illnesses and disabilities. These costs can be
huge ($20,000 to $30,000 annually for nursing home care), and they
remain largely outside the social-insurance model of
protection.
Aggregate
statistics suggest some of the financial problems (but not the
emotional strains) that many Americans are going through to help
chronically ill spouses and other relatives. Of the $38.1 billion
spent for nursing home care in the United States in 1986, only 1.6
percent (or $600 million) was paid for through Medicare and only
0.8 percent (or $300 million) was financed by private health
insurance. Thus, less than 3 percent of the total nursing home bill
in 1986 was covered by any insurance system. Direct payments by
patients and their families accounted for 51 percent of the total,
and Medicaid, the means-tested welfare program for health care,
paid 41 percent. (The remaining 5 percent of nursing home spending
was accounted for by private charity and other government
programs.)
The U.S.
health-care system is drastically imbalanced in dealing with
long-term