Archives

Search Archives

Ford Foundation president on grant making in uncertain economic climate. Read More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Development Finance and Economic Security »

The Common Good: Social Welfare and the American Future







such cost-control measures will avoid the painful choices between raising taxes and increasing the financial contributions that the elderly make to Medicare. The situation is made more difficult by the fact that Medicare is headed for trouble even though it hardly addresses one of the most important and rapidly growing needs— long-term care for chronic illness. Consequently, it seems likely that Medicare is going to require both new cost-control measures and new money so the program can assure actuarial soundness in the Hospital Insurance trust fund and extend a greater measure of government protection for long-term care.

Although cost-containment policies are in place for hospitals, Medicare needs a new system of paying individual physicians in order to help bring their cost increases under control. The current system underwrites cost escalation and fails to create incentives for physicians to economize on the use of health services. Other measures might include a greater emphasis on alternative health-care delivery systems and greater government efforts to steer Medicare patients toward "preferred providers" who charge reasonable fees and have demonstrated their cost-effectiveness. These reforms are easier to outline than to implement. One should not under-estimate the difficulty of decelerating Medicare cost increases without jeopardizing the quality of health care or access to it.

Creating Protection for Long-Term Care

Even though our society spends about $100 billion per year on Medicare and about $50 billion on Medicaid, the elderly remain vulnerable to the costs of lingering illnesses and disabilities. These costs can be huge ($20,000 to $30,000 annually for nursing home care), and they remain largely outside the social-insurance model of protection.

Aggregate statistics suggest some of the financial problems (but not the emotional strains) that many Americans are going through to help chronically ill spouses and other relatives. Of the $38.1 billion spent for nursing home care in the United States in 1986, only 1.6 percent (or $600 million) was paid for through Medicare and only 0.8 percent (or $300 million) was financed by private health insurance. Thus, less than 3 percent of the total nursing home bill in 1986 was covered by any insurance system. Direct payments by patients and their families accounted for 51 percent of the total, and Medicaid, the means-tested welfare program for health care, paid 41 percent. (The remaining 5 percent of nursing home spending was accounted for by private charity and other government programs.)

The U.S. health-care system is drastically imbalanced in dealing with long-term