Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Environment and Development »

Competition in the U.S. Energy Industry







indirect substitution, in the form of increased use of electricity, is possible. In terms of the geographic dimensions of the markets, uranium clearly trades in a national market; the market for crude oil tends to be national, if not international in scope. Natural gas also trades in a national market. In the case of coal, the results are not without some ambiguity, due to variations in sulfur content; what was once a regional market now appears to be a national market.

Levels of seller concentration, based on production figures, are not high in the case of the fossil fuels. The most significant findings is that a steady upward trend in concentration levels has been occurring since 1955. Concentration levels in uranium tend to be higher, but significant amounts of excess capacity exist and it is not certain if present concentration levels will persist. In addition, there is reason to believe that the upward trend will continue. The proper interpretation of observed concentration levels in the case of crude oil is complicated by the existence of large numbers of joint venture arrangements which create a direct interdependency among sellers.

Interfuel mergers have caught the public's attention in recent years, and have raised a concern that oil company entry represents an attempt to monopolize the industry. The analysis presented here indicates that, while concentration levels have been rising, oil company entry is not the major reason for the upward trend.

It cannot be concluded from the results of the structural analysis that effective competition exists in the production of fossil fuels and nuclear energy in the U.S., nor can it be concluded that competition is ineffective. Such conclusions would be premature and must await an analysis of market conduct and performance. It should also be emphasized that the structural analysis of energy markets is weakened by a necessity to rely upon production data rather than data which reveals the ownership pattern of reserves of the various fuels.

In conclusion, the structural analysis indicates: (1) concentration levels tend to be low but a strong upward trend is present and (2) oil companies have entered, to a significant degree, the coal and uranium areas.

NOTES

Footnote :

1. Interdependency occurs in a market where a few sellers exist. In this setting, sellers recognize that the actions, such as price changes, of any single seller will have an impact on rivals and thus likely cause a reaction by rivals. The opposite of interdependency, independence, occurs in markets populated by many, relatively small sellers.

Interdependency has been described as "... significant for markets in which there are sellers or buyers (or both) who are sufficiently important to warrant the assumption that the effects of their individual actions or their competitors will not be disregarded." William Fellner, Competition Among the Few (New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965), p. 7.