View all Archives -
Environment and Development »
Nuclear Theft: Risks and Safeguards
materials accountancy alone would provide insufficient
protection against small thefts by a plant employee given the limit
of error of material unaccounted for (LEMUF) in any such system, as
discussed in Chapters 5 and 7, and the knowledge the employee would
normally have of what the LEMUF was.
THEFT BY
A CRIMINAL GROUP
Reasons
There are two
reasons why a criminal group might want nuclear weapon materials.
One is obvious: money, which might be obtained through black market
or ransom dealings in the materials themselves, in fabricated
fission explosive devices, or in fabricated plutonium dispersal
devices. The corollary reason is that the possession of a few
fission explosives or radiological weapons might place a criminal
group rather effectively beyond the reach of law enforcement
authorities. A criminal organization might use the threat of
nuclear violence against an urban population to deter police action
directed against its nuclear theft operations. The organization
might also use nuclear threats to extort from the government a
tacit or explicit relaxation of law enforcement activities directed
against a broad range of other lucrative criminal
operations.
Scope of
the Risk
To what
extent would criminal groups become interested in the potential for
financial gains in illicit trade in nuclear material? It may be
argued that the potential gains are so large that a wide variety of
criminal organizations would attempt to exploit the possibilities
of nuclear theft. To the contrary, however, it may be argued that
criminal groups primarily interested in money are likely to be
politically conservative, and that they would not develop a black
market in a commodity such as nuclear material which could have
revolutionary political implications. Moreover, a large nuclear
theft might prompt a massive governmental crackdown and lead to a
widespread public outcry, whereas the continued existence of
organized crime on a large scale might depend on the susceptibility
of some government officials to corruption and on a degree of
public indifference.
The
possession of a few nuclear weapons as a deterrent against law
enforcement may be viewed by a criminal group as more of a risk
than a benefit. In order to obtain the advantage of a deterrent
effect, the criminal group possessing such weapons would have to be
willing to inflict large scale, indiscriminate harm on society.
Moreover, like nuclear war between nations, if the deterrent failed
and a criminal group either used nuclear weapons or failed to use
them, the group itself would probably not survive the crisis as an
organization.