Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Environment and Development »

Nuclear Theft: Risks and Safeguards







In the past, fabricating nuclear fuel, manufacturing powder and pellets, loading pellets into tubes, and bundling tubes into elements have been carried on at different locations requiring transport of nuclear material between each special operation. Firms building both fuel fabrication and reprocessing facilities have thus far generally located them in different parts of the country. However, some firms are now seriously considering building fuel fabrication plants adjacent to reprocessing plants. On balance, it would appear that firms offering nuclear fuel cycles services should be encouraged, and perhaps required, to consolidate their facilities at as few locations as practical.

DETECTION OF COMPLETED NUCLEAR THEFTS

Functions of Detection

At the outset of a discussion of the means of detecting nuclear theft, it is necessary to differentiate and clarify various functions that detection may serve within an overall system of safeguards. Without positive assurance that unlawful diversion would be detected, it would be impossible to have confidence that a safeguards system was working effectively. Hence, an important function of detection is to verify the effectiveness of protective measures. Detection may also, as discussed above, actually prevent theft if the means of detection scares the thieves away or if detection leads to apprehension of the criminals before the theft is complete. Any detection may trigger efforts to recover material that has been previously stolen.

Finally, the detection capability may itself constitute a deterrent to theft. The extent to which this indirect or secondary deterrent effect is achieved depends largely on whether the detection capability is perceived by potential thieves as being related directly to either prevention or recovery, or both. A detection capability not clearly and convincingly related to either prevention or recovery capabilities would have little effect as a deterrent. (This conclusion applies mainly to domestic criminal diversion from nuclear power industries. At the international level, the likelihood of detection of governmentally authorized diversion and the ensuing exposure of its intention may help to deter governments from acquiring nuclear weapons.)

It should be noted that, apart from safeguards considerations, accurate knowledge about material flows in nuclear industry is important for two other reasons. Indeed, these reasons may be more important than the assurance against nuclear theft which various means of detection provide.

In the first place, nuclear materials—and especially high-enriched uranium, plutonium, and uranium–233—are extremely valuable fuels. The accuracy of measurement and accounting methods, therefore, will have very large financial implications for nuclear industry. Both the owner and the processors of material being fabricated into nuclear fuel or reprocessed following irradiation will want accurate measurement and accounting procedures. Moreover,