Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Environment and Development »

Nuclear Theft: Risks and Safeguards







established would probably be controlled by the perpetrators of the threat, and any overt connection made by the perpetrators may well be false. In these circumstances, no action against the nuclear power industry would seem warranted, although safeguard measures might be tightened, especially those aimed at the response area itself.

THE PRINCIPLE OF CONTAINMENT

Having examined a variety of safeguard measures, we turn now to the task of pulling them together into a coherent system. Here we limit our discussion to the prevention of nuclear theft, which we believe is the primary and most important function of a safeguards system.

As a guide for designing a nuclear safeguards system we suggest what we call the "principle of containment." According to this principle, all materials that could be used to make fission explosives and that are used, produced, or processed in the nuclear power industry would be contained in areas circumscribed by a well defined set of barriers. These barriers would exclude unauthorized persons. A minimum number of authorized channels for the flow of such materials through the barriers would be established. All other channels would be continuously monitored, by means of the best available technology, to detect any unauthorized flow of materials. In addition to the physical barriers, a network of alarms, communications, and security forces would be set up in such a way that no credible attempt to remove nuclear materials from authorized channels, whether by employees, outsiders, or a combination, would be successful.

The containment principle suggests emphasis on immediate detection of unauthorized material flows, rather than measurement after the fact of authorized material flows and inventories. In other words, more attention would be given to material that is detected where it is not supposed to be than to material that is where it should be. Such a detection system would not, however, prevent an attempted theft by employees or outsiders unless it is supported by effective means to stop or slow down any unauthorized flow that is detected long enough to allow security forces to arrive in sufficient strength to prevent completion of the theft. Furthermore, methods should be employed to detect immediately any attempt at unauthorized entry into an area where the containment principle is applicable.

The risks of nuclear theft appear to us to warrant the development of a safeguards system for the U.S. nuclear power industry (and also nuclear power industries in other countries) that would prevent a significant armed attack from being successful. Accordingly, the maximum credible threat which the nuclear safeguards system would be designed to defeat would be an attack by a group of perhaps a dozen persons employing sophisticated firearms and equipment.