Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Environment and Development »

Nuclear Theft: Risks and Safeguards







DEVELOPMENT OF SAFEGUARDS AGAINST NUCLEAR DIVERSION

Material Controls in the Early U.S. Weapons Program2

During the atomic bomb development in World War II, careful control was maintained over nuclear material not only to protect military secrets, but also because every possible gram of material produced was needed to fabricate the first weapons. Plant managers and their military supervisors were fully informed of the status of the material and its use. Material balances were important primarily in order to improve and control the processes involved, and to ensure that all available material was converted to its intended use.

Though plant inventory information was accumulated, no formal materials control over the entire operation had been instituted by the end of 1946 when the Manhattan Engineering District operations were transferred to the newly established AEC. In 1947 a small group was formed within the AEC into the Source and Fissionable Materials Accountability Branch of the Production Division. From its inception, the functions of this group were accountancy and control against loss. The number of AEC operations and the quantities of material involved increased greatly in the 1950s, but the general direction of the Materials Accountability Branch and its successors did not change until the mid 1960s.

During the 1950s and early 1960s, material balances—the backbone of modern material accountancy systems—generally were not closed by a complete series of measurements. Measurements were dependent on the willingness of production managers to make them, and many production managers did not see the need for measurements on scrap materials. In some very important cases, the measurement procedures simply did not exist.

The nuclear material control function was upgraded in the early 1950s to divisional status as the Division of Nuclear Materials Management at AEC headquarters. Even though the Division's control system was incomplete, the overall security against loss was high. The AEC had multiple avenues for protection against loss. To achieve the necessary control over material involved in its operations, the AEC depended on responsible management furnished by its operating contractors, employees whose loyalty and reliability were subject to security clearance, and on physical protection measures at the facilities involved; and finally, material accountancy. With these measures in effect, transfers of materials between plants or operations were considered transfers between friends. Separate measurements by shipper and receiver were infrequent and, if the measurements taken indicated the existence of a discrepancy, it was frequently negotiated away.