Archives

Search Archives

2010 Census: Ford Foundation supporting national movement to increase citizen particapation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Environment and Development »

Financing the Energy Industry







substitute, whereas Chase Manhattan would presumably regard these as inadequate substitutes.)

It is the contention of this section that a return to a truly free market in petroleum is all that is necessary to avoid shortages of capital. A shortage of capital will arise only with government price restrictions. This does not imply in itself that a free market in petroleum will result in optimal quantities of capital. It is necessary, therefore, to explore in theory and with regard to current institutions and policy issues whether optimal quantities of capital are likely to be generated by a free market. It is not within the scope of this book to deal adequately with this issue. Some relevant discussion will be presented in Section 8.

Footnotes

Footnote :

a The First National Bank of Chicago study was completed after the initial draft of this book and could only be treated here in a postscript.

Footnote :

b The complete Bankers Trust analysis has not been published at this writing, but the author has had the benefit of discussing this work with the individuals involved.

3.2 PROVIDING CAPITAL IN FREE MARKETS

In a free market there can be no such thing as a shortage. This statement holds when either the quantity desired by consumers or the quantity offered by producers responds to price. Any potential deficit in supply is always removed by some increase in price, and any potential surplus is removed by a fall in the price, there always being some price which the market will clear.

The assumptions necessary for this proposition are unquestionably valid for the various petroleum markets. In the long run, there is no doubt that higher prices would bring about greater supplies. Numerous studies have shown an appreciable response of oil and gas supply to price. Also, in the long run there is no question that consumer demand will fall with higher prices for products such as gasoline, heating oil, heavy fuel oil, and natural gas. Evidence on gasoline is readily forthcoming from the European experience, with very high prices causing a much smaller consumption, principally by the use of smaller automobile engines, and from the study of Houthakker and Verlager which is expected to be published in this series.

But even in the short run, greater supplies will be had at higher prices, and smaller quantities demanded at higher prices, although these responses will be much smaller and require larger price movements to clear the market. Experience in the petroleum market has confirmed this on many occasions. For example, during 1970 there was considerable concern about a potential shortage of heavy fuel oil due to rising demands for clean fuels and a shortage of natural gas caused by price restrictions. The response of the federal government at that time was to let the free market handle this potential shortage. The result was a substantial increase in price, but no cases of shortage. The Office of Emergency Preparedness investigated over fifty cases of alleged shortages, particularly in the New England area, and found that in no case was the claim supported.

Thus, the role of the free energy market in eliminating shortages and surpluses is not simply a theoretical or academic point. When allowed to work, the market works. If the effectiveness of the market in this respect is not obvious in the energy field, it is because it is commonly not allowed to work.