View all Archives -
Environment and Development »
The Energy Conservation Papers
Total
Energy Consumption for the County
All of our
conclusions thus far have been drawn from per-capita energy
results. If a scarcity of petroleum should develop, total energy
consumption would become a more relevant figure to examine. Table
2-9 shows the expected total energy consumption for travel on a
weekday in the study area, for the early 1970s, and for the nine
future options for 1985 and 2000. (Again we return to the assumed
reversal-decentralization trend.) The total energy results vary
according to the options in much the same way as per-capita
results; the conclusions already stated can be applied to total
energy consumption as well. The only difference is that because of
the increased population in 2000, the trends for total energy use
are less dramatic than for per-capita energy consumption.
Under the
assumptions this study makes, future energy consumption for the
population as a whole is considerably higher than present energy
consumption, except for Scenario C. This implies that future energy
consumption for transportation in the area studied here, and thus
probably in many other metropolitan areas, will increase
significantly by 1985 and even more so by 2000, unless some of
Scenario C's district changes in life style and energy
characteristics of automobiles take place.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Many of the
energy-reducing strategies considered in this analysis focus
directly on the automobile. At present, in our study area, the auto
is responsible for 98 percent of the total energy consumed for
urban transportation. Is this dominance likely to continue? From
Table 2-10 we see that the auto's role varies widely among the nine
options.
Where the
auto is far and away the principal energy-consumer, as in Options
A1, A2, and B3, any improvement in
its energy efficiency produces a proportionate decrease in the
overall energy consumed to transport people. In these cases, an
emphasis on fuel-thrifty automobiles is the technological measure
which makes the biggest difference. As we progress through other
options, the combined use of efficient autos and other
energy-thrifty modes dilutes the
Table 2-9.Total Energy Consumed by the
Population of the Study Area as a Whole, for the Purposes of an
Average Weekday's Transportation (Billion Btu per Day, for the
Present and in 1985 and 2000 According to the Options for the
Future)
| Option |
A1 |
A2 |
B1 |
B2 |
B3 |
B4 |
C1 |
C2 |
C3 |
| Early 1970s: 22.5 Billion
Btu per Day |
| 1985 |
45.1 |
33.9 |
36.2 |
30.1 |
29.7 |
26.8 |
22.4 |
21.7 |
9.32 |
| 2000 |
68.6 |
47.0 |
48.7 |
41.7 |
32.9 |
33.6 |
16.1 |
20.4 |
6.93 |