View all Archives -
Human Rights »
Created Equal: A Report on Ford Foundation Women's Programs
developed by the minority civil rights program offered useful
guides for first steps. Although women had benefited from the
Foundation's poverty, family-planning, and school-reform programs,
relatively few women or women's organizations were direct
recipients of Foundation support. Moreover, no sustained women's
program existed.
Ford Foundation
personnel by race and gender.
|
1973 |
1979 |
1986 |
| Percent Minority |
| Trustees |
6.3 |
20.0 |
23.5 |
| Professional Staff |
6.6 |
8.3 |
14.0 |
| Support Staff |
23.1 |
28.1 |
37.8 |
| Percent Women |
| Trustees |
12.5 |
15.0 |
17.6 |
| Professional Staff |
22.9 |
32.6 |
53.2 |
| Support Staff |
89.1 |
86.7 |
82.0 |
In 1972 Bundy
appointed a small, interdivisional Task Force on Women to
investigate grant-making possibilities in the area of women's
rights and opportunities. Its five original members began a
wide-ranging exploration of subjects relating to women's status,
changing gender roles, work patterns, and the
family—primarily in the United States, but also in developing
countries. Discussions soon placed the heaviest emphasis on
questions of poverty and women's economic roles. Task Force members
reasoned that improving women's economic status would help improve
other aspects of their lives and their families' well-being. This
became a guiding assumption as members investigated sex
discrimination, both in the law and in social practice; access to
education and employment; health and family issues, including the
sensitive matter of reproductive choice; and changing assumptions
about "proper" sex roles. Almost a year of study and consultation
culminated in a 1973 report to the Board of Trustees, which
recommended Foundation support for "a program starting with a
concern for women's economic role but reaching out to many of the
ramifications that develop from that...."
As a result,
the National Affairs and the Education and Research divisions each
set aside $1 million in reserve funds for this program and assigned
responsibility for women's grants to particular program officers.
In the International Division, the pace of developments was slower.
Some program officers believed that women's