Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Community Development »

Affordable Housing







TABLE 4
Measures of Housing Inadequacy
1983 (000s Units)
Units with Households Earning 50% of Median Income
All Units Hispanic Black Female Elderly
Total Occupied Units 84,842 2,461 4,636 12,089 8,398
Inadequate 7,561 464 1,378 1,932 1,190
Percent 8.9 18.9 29.7 16.0 14.2
Severely Inadequate (2,876) (167) (489) (758) (523)
Percent (3.4) (6.8) (10.6) (6.3) (6.2)
Source: Special tabulations based on the 1983 Annual Housing Survey, as reported in Iredia Irby, "Housing Problems in 1983 (A Synopsis)." U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Division of Housing and Demographic Analysis, June 1985.

852,000 units deteriorated to the point of inadequacy. That is, for every 1,000 units of inadequate housing removed from the stock, 852 newly inadequate units were added. The Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University has concluded that the number of renters living in inadequate housing grew by 200,000 between 1974 and 1981. The real income erosion among the poor and the loss of federal rehabilitation subsidies suggest that housing quality will continue to deteriorate in the future.

Rural Housing

Rural housing deserves special mention because the dynamics of housing deprivation in rural communities are often counter to those in cities. For instance, affordability is the dominant problem in urban areas, but quality is the major issue in rural locations. The quality of rural housing is the worst in the nation, with almost one-fourth of the rural poor living in dilapidated units. In addition, rural household income is uniformly lower than that of urban households. This problem has been exacerbated by the deep depression in the agricultural sector over the past few years. Rural housing is generally more affordable than urban housing, however, as Table 5 indicates.

Besides their problems of poverty, rural areas lack the banking services that are taken for granted in most cities. For instance, over 25 percent of all rural counties were without a savings and loan institution in 1980. Federal support for rural housing is administered by the Farmer's Home Administration (fm ha). Two programs are especially important: the "502" homeownership program and the "515" rental program. Both provide fifty-year, one-percent mortgages to for-profit or not-for-profit developers,