Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Community Development »

Affordable Housing







cross-subsidy approaches, an attempt to shift the cost burden from government to the private sector by compelling the haves to underwrite the have-nots. As this publication later describes, the most common types of cross-subsidy devices are housing trust funds and inclusionary zoning. Through one formula or another, private developers who seek a building permit or zoning variance must, under certain circumstances, make a specified cash contribution to a housing fund or else themselves undertake to supply directly a specified number of low- or moderate-income housing units.

The nonprofit and quasi-private sectors have also responded. More foundations—private, community, and corporate—are involved in housing than in the past. Joining both them and government are fresh allies from the private sector in various roles, including that of concessional investors. Even the added philanthropic and quasi-philanthropic resources are orders of magnitude smaller than government resources, however. They enhance the pool of housing capital more by strategic pinpointing than by quantity. Banks, corporations, and foundations have become increasingly knowledgeable in multiplying the value of both market and public capital by applying their slender resources to achieve optimal configurations.

The foregoing overview of a century of housing serves as a background for the sections that follow. The remainder of the paper sets forth the facts and figures that depict the housing problems of disadvantaged families. It also reprises the Foundation's past activities and suggests a range of specific initiatives to be explored in the future. The programmatic discussion concentrates on the problems of the poor and near-poor, with added emphasis on the deprivations of the new homeless, especially those who have fallen into that misfortune from society's mainstream.

Acknowledging that the housing of the poor will remain a Foundation priority, the paper also signals our intent to keep the Foundation's public-policy window open to issues that affect the housing status of all levels of society. As the foregoing overview indicates, America's housing sector has to be seen as a whole, since all housing markets—poor, near-poor and non-poor—are subject to common economic forces and interconnect through the market process. Housing issues must be grasped within the framework of broader social trends and national policies.