and decongestion, which meant more internal dwelling space per
person and more external area per dwelling unit.
The proposed
tenement improvements were expensive and fiercely resisted by
property owners. Opposition was overcome, as was to happen in
succeeding waves of intervention, by recruiting as advocates the
upper ranks of civic leaders plus an assortment of social reformers
and, even then, the media. The impetus for Wave One was more than
an appeal to humaneness and compassion. As would be true of
subsequent waves, a decisive argument was that doing good for the
poor was doing good for everyone. Better housing was an act of
self-preservation; even the affluent were prey to tuberculosis. A
second compelling argument, which was also to re-echo in later
eras, was the threat to the social order. Environment shapes
character and, likewise, poor housing conditions were believed to
spawn degraded people without capacity to meet the obligations of
citizenship. It was during Wave One that housing was first
construed as a "merit good," distinguishable from other consumer
goods and entitled to the public regard. Housing thus evolved from
a commodity into a cause.
The second wave
of federal intervention arrived during the Great Depression. Not
everyone remembers that President Hoover, not Franklin Roosevelt,
was its instigator. It was through his prompting that the Home
Owners Loan Corporation was established to rescue distressed
homeowners and mortgate lenders. The era of subsidy had begun,
albeit tentatively and selectively. A year or two later, the advent
of the New Deal brought with it the full breadth of Wave Two: new
programs to address the deficiencies of the "one-third of a nation
[that was] ill-housed." Wave Two is remembered for its public
housing-cum-slum clearance for the poor, and Federal Housing
Administration (fha)
mortgage insurance for the middle class.
fha mortgages were
unsubsidized; indeed, their insurance premiums ultimately yielded
dividends. But public housing required a substantial federal
appropriation to underwrite capital costs and an agreement from
municipalities to waive most of the property tax. The span of
subsidy widened.
The third wave
came soon after World War II, inspired by the imperative of
rehousing the millions of returning veterans who were bent on
marriage and family. The new programs were also meant to provide
outlets for the accumulated wartime savings of other millions who
had at last the means to satisfy deferred yearnings for
homeownership. Wave Three was accompanied by an extraordinary
residential building boom, with new starts reaching an all-time
high of nearly 2 million units a year, a level never before
achieved. Veterans and other upwardly mobile families were assisted
without explicit subsidy, apart from negligible amounts applied
to