overlapping, about inconsistent decisions by different agencies
and programs, and about inadequacies in the machinery for resolving
these jurisdictional disputes fairly and efficiently.
Regulatory
Disputes
While
regulatory bodies resolve major policy issues, they also process
large numbers of routine disputes. For example, the Civil
Aeronautics Board (CAB), in addition to allocating airline routes
(large, complex disputes), will in a given year also handle several
thousand passenger and shipper complaints, tariff applications, and
referrals. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in
addition to about 100 formal hearings per year, will also rule on
several thousand registration statements. During Fiscal Year 1976,
the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC), received
97,674 complaints, resolved 82,537, and had a backlog of 122,000
cases.
There are
differences of degree among the kinds of conflicts that arise in
the normal regulatory process and the more complex disputes. The
routine disputes involve fewer parties, the range of choice is
narrower, the implications of alternative decisions are less
dramatic, and fewer decision-making bodies are involved. Still, the
high volume of such disputes presents serious management problems
and consumes substantial energies and resources. At both the
federal and state levels, agency dockets are clogged, resulting in
inordinate delays in the processing of licenses and permits and in
the administration of social programs. The sheer volume of the work
that does get done means that even though each decision has limited
impact, the overall effect can be great. Moreover, these disputes
sometimes contain the germs of more complex issues. For