View all Archives -
Environment and Development »
Forestry for Sustainable Rural Development
Social Forestry Projects.
The handbook marked a departure from past standards of
monitoring, which concentrated on biophysical achievements and
relied on indicators such as number of trees planted and the
percentage of seedlings that survived. Instead, the guide
recognized the importance of the development of forest communities
and provided tools for workers to assess the social dimensions of
their efforts. Examples of questions in the handbook include:
-
■ What
apprehensions did the participants manifest in participating in
project activities? How and by whom were their apprehensions
responded to? What were the results?
-
■ What
selection criteria were used [for project participants]? Who were
the core group members selected? Cite information about their
background and character traits.
-
■ What
tenurial problems do participating families experience? How have
they managed such problems?
-
■ Who
were formally elected or appointed to leadership positions in the
community? What functions do they undertake? On what basis or under
what circumstances were they chosen?
In
recognition of the need to mesh social and technical understanding
in the forestry sector, social science theory and methodologies
have been incorporated into the curriculum of formal forestry
degree programs in several South and Southeast Asian countries. For
example, the Ateneo de Manila's Institute of Philippines Culture
and its Sociology and Anthropology Department jointly offered a
master's program designed to develop a cadre of individuals skilled
in promoting community management of natural resources. The program
grew out of the institute's extensive experience in social forestry
and irrigation management, in which institute staff had developed
skills in helping bureaucracies become more supportive of
community-based programs. The institute developed a planning tool
for assessing both the social and the technical dimensions of
communities that were candidates for government assistance, applied
participatory rural appraisal techniques to community-level
planning, and introduced process documentation research. It also
helped develop for government and nongovernment personnel training
courses and manuals that incorporated participatory methods. The
two-year master's program was opened to Southeast Asian students in
1986 and by 1993 had graduated 35 students from Indonesia, the