Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Environment and Development »

The American Energy Consumer







anticipated that the impact of shortages and costs weigh most heavily on them. We assumed that income was basic to our analysis, and it was. We could identify the extremes—those who could buy only necessities such as heat and light, and those who could afford luxuries such as central air conditioning and an outdoor gas light burning night and day.

The study provides two kinds of results: first, descriptions of what is true about energy consumption in households; and second, a basis for answering some key policy questions. Some of those questions are: (1) What role can households play in using energy more efficiently or in conserving it? (2) What role can other agencies—for instance, utilities, regulatory commissions, business, and government—play in helping households make more efficient use of energy? (3) What might the probable impact be of policies to conserve or allocate an energy source, or to improve air quality, on households of different kinds?

The book begins with a bit of history, showing how quickly we have become an energy devouring people (Chapter One). We follow with an investigative reporter's portrayal of how six households of widely different kinds have come to use energy as they do today (Chapter Two). Chapters Three and Four then present the basic background information—what uses most energy in homes and in transportation. These chapters analyze the implications of this and of recent trends in homebuilding and car production as well. The next two chapters get to the heart of household energy use: the amount and cost of the energy households consume and the air pollution effects for major income groups, emphasizing especially the difference between the poor, the almost poor and the better off (Chapters Five and Six). Chapter Seven describes the energy situation of black households at varying economic levels, compared with whites at similar levels. In conclusion (Chapter Eight) we outline a few suggested energy policies for public discussion. These proposals are based on information in the previous chapters, and their object is to suggest ways to increase the efficiency of household energy use and thus help reduce rising consumption while improving the equity of energy distribution and costs among households. We think the proposals could also contribute to the growth and stability of the nation's economy and improve the American level of living.

Footnotes

Footnote :

b Financed through a grant from the Ford Foundation's Energy Policy Project to the Washington Center for Metropolitan Studies and from general support by the Ford Foundation to the Washington Center, with Dorothy K. Newman as director of the study.

Footnote :

c In response, the Energy Policy Project of the Ford Foundation issued a preliminary report early in the spring of 1974, Exploring Energy Choices, citing some of our early findings. In addition, we supplied information directly to the Federal Energy Office, the Office of Economic Opportunity, and to other agencies, committees, or commissions during the critical months of 1973-74.

Footnote :

d The field work was conducted in May-June 1973 by Response Analysis Corporation of Princeton, N.J., for the Washington Center for Metropolitan Studies. The questionnaire, households' reponses, and details about the survey and the sample are found in the Appendix to this book.

Footnote :

e Most reports were for twelve months ending in May, June, or July 1973, after the spot heating oil shortage in the winter of 1972-73, but before the more widespread fuel oil and gasoline shortage of 1973-74. Details about the utility survey are found in the Appendix, including a list of the utility companies that assisted us.

Footnote :

f The methods for arriving at totals and average-per-household estimates for electricity, natural gas, and gasoline are described in the Appendix.

Footnote :

g The poor were defined using the federal government's criteria. The nonpoor in this book are divided as follows: lower middle (under $12,000 income); upper middle ($12,000-$15,999); and well off ($16,000 and over). See Chapter Five for details.

HIGHLIGHTS

The main findings on which suggested policies are based are repeated in virtually every area into which the investigation reached. They show, without doubt, that the more money you have, the more energy you use at home and in your automobile. This is regardless of any other condition—climate; how and how far you commute to work; the size of your house; your age; number of people in