Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Environment and Development »

The American Energy Consumer







Carbon monoxide reduces the amount of oxygen that blood can carry, and thus is hard on the heart. If a person has coronary artery disease, even low levels of CO can be harmful. A study cited by the Environmental Protection Agency in drawing up the federal standard for CO noted that at a fairly low level "... there is evidence of physiologic stress in patients with heart disease." Effects may be present at even lower levels. (see Tables 6-2 and 6-3). CO pollution is expressed in milligrams per cubic meter of air (mg/m3) and the federal standard, at 10 mg/m3, is lower than levels at which physiological effects may occur—at 35 mg/m3 or even 23 mg/m3. The effects of SO2, particulates, and CO, the levels of concentration where the effects take place, and the current federal standards are presented in Tables 6-2 and 6-3. As is readily apparent, the standards, especially for particulates and SO2, were not set much lower than the thresholds of significant effects.

Hydrocarbons by themselves evidently do not threaten health. But in the presence of sunlight they react with nitrogen dioxide to form ozone, a main ingredient of photochemical smog. Ozone irritates the eyes, but beyond that its effects have not been established. However, some authorities cite dangers that could lead to ill health. For example, Dr. Oscar J. Balchum of the University of Southern California states:

It is apparent that ozone results in sensory irritation, inflammation of the airways and alveoli of the lungs, and reacts with cell membrane and lung tissue components.... morphological and cellular alterations... could be the inception of chronic processes, resulting in persisting functional aberrations or even disease.

In any case, control of ozone means control of hydrocarbons, and the government has set standards.

Professor Lyndon Babcock of the University of Illinois has estimated the relative damage from air pollutants. Since some air pollutants damage health more than others, there is little use in simply adding together the various amounts. So Professor Babcock has developed a way to measure air pollution's overall harm to health. The method estimates roughly that effects of total suspended particulates (TSP) are three times the effects of their emissions (15 percent to 45 percent) and the effect of SO2 is twice as large as its emission effect (15 percent to 30 percent). On the other hand, CO, which makes up nearly 50 percent of total pollution emissions, accounts for only 5 percent of total damage according to Babcock. HC makes up about 15 percent of emissions and causes around 5 percent of total effects.

These and other effects of air pollution are expensive. Estimated costs for 1970 were $12.3 billion. Of that, damage to human health was $4.6 billion; reduced property values $5.8 billion; materials damage $1.7 billion; and