View all Archives -
Environment and Development »
The American Energy Consumer
reduce car weight, support alternatives to cars, and reduce
automobile air pollution.
-
Proposed
"Truth in Energy" legislation should provide that buyers of all
cars (used as well as new) be given information about car weight
and miles per gallon of gasoline. Since most cars are bought
used, a labeling provision is especially important for them. This
would have to be a local responsibility. Whether buying a new or
used car, better consumer information could have an important
effect on demand, and thus on eventual energy savings and reduced
air pollution.
-
A
federal tax should be added to state license taxes (already on a
weight basis) for all cars over 2,750 pounds, to go to a public
transit trust fund. (See recommendation (3) below for a
description of the fund.)
-
The
federal gasoline tax should be amended to assess a higher gasoline
tax on cars that weigh more than 2,750 pounds to go to the public
transit trust fund. Large cars would pull up to pumps set to
include the higher tax in the metered reading. The FEA would
provide car weight information annually to all registered gasoline
dealers. The tax increase should be earmarked for a public transit
fund. Revenues would go to states to assist public transportation
systems according to a carefully developed formula. The formula
should take into account commuting mileage and patterns, and
population size and density. The U.S. Treasury should collect all
the revenues and make sure that distribution occurs fairly.
Consideration should be given to providing a
greater proportional share to metropolitanwide, intercity,
intermetropolitan, and cross-county systems. Some of the trust fund
should be earmarked for innovation in flexible small vehicle group
systems to serve sparsely populated areas. If successful, some of
the systems could be spun off for private operation after
testing.
States and
localities as well as the federal government can benefit from lower
weight cars and better public transportation. This means less wear
and tear on streets, roads, and highways, and reduced maintenance
and repair. Air pollution could be reduced also, improving public
health. Reduced air pollution would help communities and businesses
that must use services to clean buildings affected by dirty
air.
These
transportation alternatives address demand as well as supply. They
ought to slow down rapidly increasing energy use, and improve air
quality and daily transportation conditions at the same time.
Federal support for urban transportation, excluding money for
airports, was estimated at $2.2 billion for fiscal year 1975; space
research and technology received $3.3 billion. It is a