Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Environment and Development »

Oil Spills and the Marine Environment







known with certainty—of the routine intentional discharge of oil by tankers at sea. Populations of several species face local extinction in the northeastern Atlantic, and one penguin species is imperiled with global extinction.

The effects of oil on marine mammals are much less well known than for birds, nonetheless they do not seem nearly as catastrophic. Marine mammals are not particularly abundant along most coasts of the world, but concern was expressed for the sea lions and elephant seals of Santa Barbara's Channel Islands, and for the migrating endangered grey whales. Despite confusing public reports, there is no conclusive evidence that any of these mammals were killed by the Santa Barbara blowout (). This was in part fortuitous, since the elephant seal pups had been recently weaned and were not feeding. Had the spill occurred earlier or later, there is a greater probability that they might have ingested oil and so increased the chance of injury.

Mammals have been affected by some spills (), however. Possible effects include suffocation by oil, disruption of insulation abilities of fur coats, and poisoning from ingested oil. In addition to pinnipeds (seals, walruses, etc.) and cetaceans (whales and dolphins), other mammals occupy coastal marine habitats. Sea otters are recovering from near extinction along the West Coast of the U.S. Commercially valuable fur bearers, mainly muskrats, inhabit coastal wetlands in Louisiana and are susceptible to oil pollution from the production fields, although fur production has not declined there ().

FISHES

There are few reports of directly lethal effects of spilled oil on fishes. Tendron () has reported a decrease in the numbers of fish off Ushant in the English Channel after the Torrey Canyon spill. Also after that spill 50 to 90 percent of the eggs of pilchard were dead, and young pilchard were rare in plankton samples taken off the coast of Cornwall (); but again the effects there were complicated by the use of dispersants. Fish kills were observed after a crude oil spill in Puerto Rico (), a spill of a variety of fuel oils at Wake Island (), and the fuel oil spill at West Falmouth (). On the other hand a thorough study by Ebeling et al. () could detect no effect of the "Platform A" blowout on Santa Barbara Channel fish communities.

There is a large body of evidence that oil, refined products, and components may be quite toxic to fishes in laboratory experiments (). Fishes may be more resistant than some other marine organisms because their surfaces, including gills, are coated with a slimy mucus that is oil repellent. Also, evidence suggests that fishes may simply move away from an area affected by oil ().

There has been concern that larval fishes, which often concentrate at the ocean surface, may be adversely affected by floating oil, either through toxicity or entrapment (). Numerous deaths among these young forms could