known with certainty—of the routine intentional discharge
of oil by tankers at sea. Populations of several species face local
extinction in the northeastern Atlantic, and one penguin species is
imperiled with global extinction.
The effects
of oil on marine mammals are much less well known than for birds,
nonetheless they do not seem nearly as catastrophic. Marine mammals
are not particularly abundant along most coasts of the world, but
concern was expressed for the sea lions and elephant seals of Santa
Barbara's Channel Islands, and for the migrating endangered grey
whales. Despite confusing public reports, there is no conclusive
evidence that any of these mammals were killed by the Santa Barbara
blowout (). This was in part fortuitous, since the elephant seal
pups had been recently weaned and were not feeding. Had the spill
occurred earlier or later, there is a greater probability that they
might have ingested oil and so increased the chance of injury.
Mammals have
been affected by some spills (), however. Possible effects include
suffocation by oil, disruption of insulation abilities of fur
coats, and poisoning from ingested oil. In addition to pinnipeds
(seals, walruses, etc.) and cetaceans (whales and dolphins), other
mammals occupy coastal marine habitats. Sea otters are recovering
from near extinction along the West Coast of the U.S. Commercially
valuable fur bearers, mainly muskrats, inhabit coastal wetlands in
Louisiana and are susceptible to oil pollution from the production
fields, although fur production has not declined there ().
FISHES
There are few
reports of directly lethal effects of spilled oil on fishes.
Tendron () has reported a decrease in the numbers of fish off
Ushant in the English Channel after the Torrey Canyon spill.
Also after that spill 50 to 90 percent of the eggs of pilchard were
dead, and young pilchard were rare in plankton samples taken off
the coast of Cornwall (); but again the effects there were
complicated by the use of dispersants. Fish kills were observed
after a crude oil spill in Puerto Rico (), a spill of a variety of
fuel oils at Wake Island (), and the fuel oil spill at West
Falmouth (). On the other hand a thorough study by Ebeling et al.
() could detect no effect of the "Platform A" blowout on Santa
Barbara Channel fish communities.
There is a
large body of evidence that oil, refined products, and components
may be quite toxic to fishes in laboratory experiments (). Fishes
may be more resistant than some other marine organisms because
their surfaces, including gills, are coated with a slimy mucus that
is oil repellent. Also, evidence suggests that fishes may simply
move away from an area affected by oil ().
There has
been concern that larval fishes, which often concentrate at the
ocean surface, may be adversely affected by floating oil, either
through toxicity or entrapment (). Numerous deaths among these
young forms could