Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Environment and Development »

Oil Spills and the Marine Environment







have recovered within a few years. This resistance and resilience is due to () the hardiness of intertidal organisms, () their rapid reproduction, and () the relatively rapid removal of oil from the intertidal zone by waves. The use of cosmetic clean-up techniques—such as toxic dispersants and steam cleaning—on oiled shores often does more harm than good and should be stringently controlled and generally discouraged. Most biologists who have experience with the effects of such techniques recommend no attempt at removal unless clearly necessary, and then only with absorbents or by scraping away oily sand.

SEABED ORGANISMS

Oil has a distinct affinity for sediment particles, especially clay minerals and particles coated with organic matter. Thus, much of the oil spilled at Santa Barbara met with water masses made turbid by heavy land run-off, formed denser-than-water, oil-sediment aggregates, and sank to the bottom of Santa Barbara Channel (). Subtidal bottoms were the ultimate depository of much of the oil spilled at Santa Barbara (), at West Falmouth (), in the English Channel (), and in Chedabucto Bay, Canada ().

While the British worsened the littoral pollution from Torrey Canyon through excessive application of toxic detergents, the French sank the oil before most of it reached shore, thus eliminating obvious intertidal pollution, but doing potentially serious if not obvious harm to bottom life. Unfortunately, the seabed organisms' subtidal habitat, especially soft, sediment-covered bottoms, has been largely ignored in most post-spill studies. Instead, concern and research effort has concentrated on the intertidal habitat.

Observations on the subtidal effects of oil spills were made on larger benthic (seabed) organisms by skin divers after the Tampico Maru and Torrey Canyon spills. Extensive kills of Pismo clams, abalones, starfish, sea urchins, lobsters, and other subtidal benthic invertebrates occurred within the small cove into which Tampico oil was spilled (). The persistence of oil in the cove and the ecological imbalance resulting from the reduction of grazing invertebrates (mainly sea urchins) and predators altered the ecology of the cove such that complete recovery could not be reported seven years after the spill.

Large numbers of dead and moribund clams, snails, crustaceans, and echinoderms were noted by divers just off shores oiled by the Torrey Canyon spill (). The effect of oil itself on the benthic organisms is impossible to assess because of the overwhelming effects of toxic dispersants applied to nearby shores. Approximately 23,500 tons of Torrey Canyon oil was sunk off the coast of Brittany by the application of 3,000 tons of chalk in order to prevent it from reaching shore (). Virtually nothing is known about the effects of this oil on bottom life or its persistence in the bottom sediments. Large masses of oil on the bottom have subsequently fouled fishing gear and contaminated catches off the French coast ().