eel, and the herring gull. Oil was detectable as deep as 70 cm
in marsh sediments, and this is in marked contrast to previous
observations that marsh sediments were uncontaminated by oil or
that oil was restricted to the upper 5 to 10 cm. Burns and Teal
further noted that there had been a reduction in straight chain
alkanes in relation to branched chain and cyclic alkanes and
aromatics since the original pollution, and that although oil was
obviously taken in by organisms, there was no evidence of food
chain magnification.
Repetitive or
chronic oil pollution as found near an oil terminal or refinery
effluent can have a decidedly harmful effect on salt marshes.
Baker's experiments () indicate that more than two or three fresh
oil spills a year or one or two light oilings per year with
weathered oil for many years would severely reduce marsh grasses.
Much of a marsh near a refinery effluent in Southampton was
completely denuded by the chronic low-level pollution from the
effluent (). Apparently the grasses were killed by being constantly
coated with thin oil films. The loss of grass cover resulted in
rapid erosion of the marsh bank.
Chronic
pollution of salt marshes can have obviously serious effects, but
the effects of a single oiling may be quite variable, depending in
part on the factors discussed above. Although most studies have not
uncovered significant effects, oils as different as the light,
aromatic-rich Number 2 oil spilled at West Falmouth, and the heavy,
less toxic Bunker C lost from the Arrow are clearly harmful
to marsh plants and animals. The effects of oil on marsh organisms
other than vascular plants have generally not been studied.
Clearly, further investigations should consider the smaller, less
obvious, but nonetheless integral organisms of the sediment
surface. Also, the findings of Burns and Teal make chemical
analysis of organisms and sediments advisable.
Mangrove
swamps are not as well studied as salt marshes. Consequently, we
lack the necessary basic and practical information to make
conclusions about the effects of oil on these environments (see 5).
Spills in Puerto Rico () and in Panama () have killed mangrove
trees and associated animals. Mangrove swamps will conceivably
suffer more pollution as offshore oil production in the tropics
increases.
SOME
SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTS
It is
obviously unrealistic to suppose that an oil spill will have the
same ecological consequences anywhere in the world. Although a
systematic geographical analysis is clearly beyond the scope of
this report, three "special" marine environments deserve attention
because of their importance, and because of the increasing threat
of oil pollution in these environments: polar regions, tropical
coral reefs, and estuaries.
I. Polar
Regions
The tapping
of oil resources in the North American arctic and
the