Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Governance »

Innovating America







workers; discretion somehow connotes a lack of accountability. For Americans the fear of possible abuse overshadows interest in positive achievements. When abuses do occur, the response tends to be to impose more controls.

Despite this clash between what is expected and what is permitted, many talented, committed people continue in government service. For them the challenge is to make something happen despite the constraints, or better yet, within the bounds of public accountability, to break through those constraints, come up with a new vision of what government can do, and find practical means of achieving it.

Footnotes

Footnote :

* "Innovation and Creativity: Comparisons Between Public Management and Private Enterprise." Alan Altshuler is director of the A. Alfred Taubman Center for State and Local Government at the Kennedy School. Zegans is executive director of the Innovations in State and Local Government Awards program. Many of the ideas in this chapter come from this article and from conversations with Altshuler.

INNOVATION

The Latin root of innovation means "to make new." The word is often associated with new discoveries or inventions that transform the quality of life. It has come to describe the link between a fresh idea or insight and a practical problem or objective. Altshuler and Zegans define it as "novelty in action." The result is a way of doing things fundamentally different from that which went before.

In the last decade, private corporations and management theorists have been increasingly concerned with innovation. Successful firms are thought to have found a way to create a corporate climate in which continual innovation is valued and rewarded. Meanwhile, management specialists study the ways in which that innovation occurs.

In the last decade as well, the voluntary sector—nonprofit organizations that specialize in tackling new social problems—has come to see itself as a separate, distinctly innovative sector of society. Many programs and institutions now considered to be integral to the public sector—kindergartens, for example, or libraries—had their origins in the voluntary sector. Meanwhile, more recent innovations—hospices, for example—are gaining wide acceptance.

The incentives for innovation differ. Among private, for-profit innovators, increased profit margins and market shares are the main incentives for "novelty in action," and immediate rewards tend to correspond to the bottom line. Private nonprofit innovators, by contrast, tend to be motivated by the desire to achieve specific objectives in the public interest. Their rewards derive from the personal satisfaction of working toward goals they see as important to society.

INNOVATIONS IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

What about innovation in government? When Ford Foundation staff began to discuss this question in 1982, they were familiar with the range of negative attitudes toward government—for example, that government achieves little, that it is part of the problem, that the sources of innovation