Archives

Search Archives

Transforming Secondary Education: New $100 million initiative to improve education quality across the nation.
Learn More »

Recent Spotlights »

View all Archives - Governance »

Innovating America







another—permitted the DCFS to start proceedings to terminate biological parents' legal rights even before the agency had located adoptive parents. Its bipartisan sponsorship alone would have made the package of proposals a candidate for prompt legislative approval, but dramatic action by Father Clements, the first president of One Church–One Child's board, undoubtedly helped reduce any remaining opposition.

FATHER CLEMENTS SETS AN EXAMPLE

Father Clements had urged his flock for months to adopt black children. Frustrated by their failure to respond, he finally announced from the pulpit that he planned to adopt a child himself. Although it had been clear from the outset that the ministers would not be silent partners in the program, nobody had expected this level of commitment. Just as the Chicago-area pilot program was getting under way, the dynamic priest not only brought the issue to the attention of his congregation, but he also attracted print, radio, and television coverage in Chicago, around the United States, and abroad.

Father Clements' adoption of 13-year-old Joey, long-time resident of an orphanage, riveted public attention on how inordinately long black children were trapped in the foster-care system. A Chicago Tribune editorial declared, "Rarely do human emotions, good economics, and good sense combine so strongly in favor of quick legislative action."

Even before the legislation passed, Coler and Johnson began to make changes to remove impediments to adoption by black families and to make the adoption bureaucracy more responsive. "We went through upheavals in the entire adoption system," Johnson recalls. "We did it through hammering away and beating down and rewarding and punishing. Some drastic changes were made in regulations to make it easier for families to adopt children. To adopt children under the old regulations you had to have a two-parent family; you had to live in a house." Social workers who went through the houses of prospective parents used to look into refrigerators and check under the beds, "all those crazy things," he said.

CHANGING A COMPLACENT BUREAUCRACY

Coler and Johnson faced a major challenge in restructuring the adoption service. It was one of the most deeply entrenched bureaucracies in the DCFS. Senior workers, most of whom were white, claimed these coveted jobs. "You worked 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. five days a week and you knew exactly what you were going to do every day," said Janis Forte, special assistant to Johnson and staff director of the One Church–One Child board. "You found kids nice, neat homes, and you gave someone a baby, and everybody loved you."