make great contributions in the future. As one dean said: "There
should be room in our stable for all kinds of horses."
COMMENTS
OF SCHOLARS' PARENTS
The colleges
and universities participating in the Early Admission Program have
not made a systematic effort to determine how the Scholars' parents
feel about the program, but two colleges (Goucher and Louisville)
conducted special canvasses of the parents of their 1951 Scholars
shortly after their graduation. These results, although based on a
very small and incomplete statistical sample, tended to confirm the
general impression reported by the colleges that the parents on the
whole have been favorable toward the program.
In the
Goucher survey, 26 of the 27 parents responding said that if they
had the choice to make again they would send their daughters to
college early. Many of the parental opinions reflected the same
balancing of advantages and disadvantages as the Scholar essays.
One mother, who said she would again choose early admission for her
daughter, remarked nonetheless that the girl had lost contact with
her high school classmates and added on the drawback side: "It was,
too, a lonely pinnacle of fame in the adolescent community."
Another expressed the opinion that entering college early "helped
to build up her self-confidence and initiative." Another wrote:
"She was made more resourceful and self-reliant; had to think and
act independently." And another: "I believe she matured in many
ways sooner than if she had completed high school."
In the
Louisville survey, 11 of the 12 responses expressed parental
approval of the Early Admission Program. The one exception, written
by the mother of a Scholar, said in part: "I would never influence
a boy or girl again into giving up the last year in high school....
[My son] entered engineering school at the age of 16. He needed the
chemistry, physics, and math he would have had his last year in
High School. He was lost as far as the work was