we probably owe many of the successful recoveries from trouble
the Scholars have made.... It is interesting that three families
have sent two Scholars each."
THE
ATTITUDES OF HIGH SCHOOL PRINCIPALS
As with
parental attitudes, the participating colleges have not made a
systematic effort to gather data about the attitudes of the high
schools from which the Scholars were chosen. However, Goucher and
Louisville polled the secondary schools from which their 1951
Scholars came, and several of the other colleges have obtained,
through correspondence and discussion, a general picture of the
reactions of principals and guidance officers.
The available
evidence suggests that the character of high school reaction is
mixed, ranging from strong approval to strong disapproval, and that
to some extent it is in the process of change.
Ten of the 12
participating colleges have reported to the Fund on their
experience with high school principals and guidance officers, often
in relation to the difficult task of Scholar selection. According
to these reports, many of the college officials have encountered
considerable resistance to the Early Admission Program. Sometimes
this has been vocal. Sometimes, as one college commented, it has
not: "The general reaction has been to ignore the plan
entirely."
Many teachers
and principals in secondary schools have been strongly opposed to
the early departure to college of some of their best potential
juniors and seniors. As one principal frankly told a college
official: "We don't like the idea of the colleges taking our
leaders out of high school at the end of the tenth or eleventh
grade."
The dean of
one of the participating colleges, reporting considerable high
school resistance to the Early Admission Program, voiced the
opinion that it "is based partially on a genuine concern for the
emotional and social development of the individual and a belief
that he will be harmed by taking him out of his
chronological