View all Archives -
Education and Scholarship »
They Went to College Early
the able student will be hurt unless special arrangements are
made to recognize and develop his ability. From this point of view,
early admission or indeed any program of enrichment is viewed as
giving the able student the same opportunity as that routinely
offered to other students. Similarly, the problem of trying to
describe the student for whom early admission would be wise is by
no means dissimilar from the problem faced by the admissions
officer in attempting to select candidates for regular admission.
Finally, the obligation of the college to insure a successful
educational experience for the early admission student differs only
in detail from the college's obligation toward normal-age
students.
"This
suggests that the important lesson from the early admission
experiment is that the American educational system cannot afford to
overlook the individuality of the students with whom it deals.
Whether these students are normal age or under-age, or whether they
have completed a formal program in secondary school is probably of
less importance than their capabilities and aspirations as
individuals. The contribution of the schools and the colleges to
society is likely to be gauged in terms of how well these are
recognized and developed, rather than in terms of formal structures
and prescribed programs."
The
Farnsworth Evaluation
Dr.
Farnsworth and his colleagues, after studying the social and
emotional adjustment of the 1951 Scholars, concluded that the
Scholars adjusted to campus life as well as their Comparison
students and classmates and that the reasons for failures among the
Scholars were the same as for college students in general.
They
suggested that the following guideposts might be helpful to
admissions officers in selecting candidates for early admission,
noting that most of them apply equally to the selection of regular
freshmen: