At all levels
of American education, the Foundation's main concerns presently are
equality of opportunity, the management and financing of
educational institutions and systems, and reforms in the learning
process.
The
Foundation's Office of Public Education works in these areas at the
pre-school, elementary, and secondary levels. The Office of Higher
Education and Research works at undergraduate and graduate
levels.
A third
office—Public Policy and Social Organization—was
created this year. Although it is administered by the Education and
Research division, its activities are not limited to education. It
supports more wide-ranging work aimed at achieving deeper insights
into public policy problems that do not fall exclusively within the
interests of any division of the Foundation.
PUBLIC
EDUCATION
Much of the
Foundation's current activity in elementary and secondary education
reflects lessons learned from the Comprehensive School Improvement
Program (CSIP). The CSIP, a $30 million effort in twenty-five
communities, was a focal point of the Foundation's efforts in
education during the 1960s. The goal was to help schools create a
climate congenial to innovations already developed, such as team
teaching, non-graded programs, audio-visual materials, and
independent study. A report issued this year pointed out that
although the CSIP achieved less than had been expected, it provided
guidelines for future Foundation approaches that have been
emphasized since 1970.
Teacher
Training.
One lesson
gleaned from the CSIP was that the people who are expected to put
new programs into operation should participate in defining problems
and developing solutions, and that to do so often requires
retraining.
To support
the efforts of small groups of teachers to improve classroom
instruction, the Foundation has helped establish informal training
centers (sometimes called teachers' centers), primarily in areas
serving minorities and other neglected student populations. At
these centers (supported this year in Boston, New York, and
Washington), teachers are trained to serve as advisors to other
teachers. Participants (teachers, school administrators,
para-professionals, and parents) further their understanding of how
children can learn from a wide range of materials and experiences.
The centers run workshops and seminars, offer space to try out and
make new materials, provide a forum for the exchange of ideas, and
answer requests for information.
Administrative Leadership.
The school
principal too often is so overwhelmed by administrative duties that
he or she has little time to provide effective leadership in
instruction. For one approach to dealing with this problem, the
Foundation granted funds this year to the Education Development
Center in Newton, Massachusetts, to plan a retraining program in
eastern Massachusetts, aimed at helping principals improve their
schools.
Over the last
four to five years, seven universities have been carrying out
reforms of their graduate programs for principals and other
educational administrators. For example, prospective school leaders
spend as much as a third of their time in field work and study the
social sciences and sophisticated management techniques in addition
to educational theory and practice.
Foundation
support was completed in 1973 with grants totaling some $2.5
million. One-fifth of the total went (through the University of
Chicago) for a central coordinating office for the seven programs,
known as the Center for Educational Leadership. The program goal of
bringing more minority-group members and women into educational
administration has been realized. Of the 280 students who have
participated, 131 are blacks, Chicanos, Puerto Ricans, or Asian
Americans, and fifty-seven are women.